Up to now ten months alone, a minimum of 9 Nigerian states, from Ekiti and Enugu to Rivers and Kano, have reshuffled their govt cupboards, typically eradicating or redeploying key commissioners throughout ministries. Whereas cupboard reshuffles aren’t uncommon in a democracy, the frequency and randomness of those adjustments reveal a structural instability that threatens the nation’s developmental ambitions, together with its aspiration to construct a technology- and AI-driven financial system.
When commissioners who oversee key innovation or digital financial system portfolios are changed midstream, their initiatives are both deserted, delayed, or redefined by successors with little institutional continuity. The result’s a cycle of coverage resets and disrupted momentum, a sample that undermines Nigeria’s probabilities of constructing a cohesive digital financial system, not to mention an AI future.
A sample of instability
Between December 2024 and October 2025, states comparable to Ekiti, Enugu, Ebonyi, Oyo, Kano, Abia, Kaduna, and Rivers witnessed cupboard shake-ups affecting ministries central to their innovation and infrastructure agenda — from Power and ICT to Commerce, Housing, and Works.
In Ekiti State, as an illustration, the formidable Ekiti Information Zone (EKZ), a flagship innovation metropolis designed to anchor the state’s digital financial system, has skilled a 12-year delay. The undertaking was conceptualised as a miniature Silicon Valley for Nigeria, a hub for analysis, expertise, and expertise startups. However since its inception, it has suffered from political discontinuity.
Akin Oyebode, who helped conceptualise the undertaking as Commissioner for Finance in 2013, laid its financial basis. Later, Seun Fakuade, as Commissioner for Innovation, Science, and Digital Economic system, led its planning section, forging partnerships and operational frameworks. Then, in August 2025, Fakuade was eliminated in a sweeping cupboard reshuffle. The undertaking, as soon as heralded as Ekiti’s ticket into Nigeria’s innovation future, now faces uncertainty, its implementation delayed till a minimum of 2026. Two months later, the governor has but to nominate a commissioner for the ministry.
Different states inform related tales. Ebonyi’s College of ICT in Oferekpe, as soon as envisioned as a hub for digital schooling, has slowed down amid forms and shifting priorities. Niger State’s digital metropolis goals started in 2023 after it appointed its first-ever Commissioner of Communications Know-how and Digital Economic system however stalled over unresolved public–personal partnerships, infrastructure bottlenecks, and the cupboard reshuffle in September 2025, which eliminated the brand new commissioner. Even federal-level innovation initiatives, such because the proposed $10 billion innovation metropolis developments in Katsina and different states, stay largely on paper.
Political volatility meets technological ambition
To construct a sustainable AI ecosystem, a rustic wants long-term coverage continuity, expert management, and institutional reminiscence, three issues Nigeria’s political system constantly undermines.
“The political boundary system is not going to produce the most effective, the fittest, or the brightest of our folks,” stated Fakuade, reflecting on his time in authorities. “What produces folks on the poll is corruption and visionless management. Till that system adjustments, we are going to maintain recycling mediocrity and questioning why nothing works.”
His frustration speaks to a broader structural flaw: the disconnect between Nigeria’s political class and the realities of the digital financial system. In lots of states, commissioners for innovation or ICT are appointed for political loyalty, not technical experience. “There are 36 commissioners for innovation or ICT within the nation,” Fakuade famous, “and lower than half of them perceive what they should do — from digital infrastructure to expertise growth or the way forward for work.”
The issue extends upward. Most governors, he argued, “don’t even perceive the abstraction of a digital financial system. They ask, ‘What does this need to do with votes?’ as a result of they’ll’t see the brick and mortar.”
With out visionary management, Nigeria’s innovation agenda dangers turning into a sequence of uncoordinated experiments, formidable on paper, inert in observe.
It additionally means there is no such thing as a solution to measure progress. In keeping with Suleiman Isah, the primary pioneer Commissioner of Communications Know-how and Digital Economic system, the unpredictability of appointments has meant that many recipients of presidency tech packages typically view it as alternatives to get their slice of the “nationwide cake”.
“Everytime you inform folks to come back for coaching, both as a result of I’m the commissioner, they anticipate we’ll give them laptops free,” Isah instructed TechCabal. “On a regular basis they arrive for coaching they need me to provide ₦10,000.”
Why AI can not develop in a vacuum
Synthetic intelligence thrives on information, infrastructure, and expertise, three pillars that require coherent governance and funding. However the foundations of Nigeria’s political system are shaky at greatest.
Contemplate Fakuade’s argument: if each Nigerian state mainstreamed future-of-work expertise, like programming and information literacy, into its schooling system, the financial system might remodel itself from the bottom up. “One million folks incomes $1,000 month-to-month in distant work creates a $12 billion financial system,” he stated. “However we’re not even considering that approach.”
As a substitute, state governments prioritise short-term, tangible initiatives comparable to roads, bridges, and buildings, whereas neglecting digital infrastructure like fiber optics, broadband growth, and tech expertise coaching. “If each governor supplied fiber optics,” Fakuade stated, “you’d unleash an unstoppable digital financial system in that state. The multiplier impact alone might develop the financial system sevenfold.”
However this requires political will and coordination — two components typically lacking in Nigeria’s governance mannequin. “The Minister of Innovation,” he lamented, “has by no means as soon as convened a gathering with commissioners of innovation throughout the states. How do you construct an AI coverage when these anticipated to implement it have by no means even been in the identical room?”
This absence of federal–state coordination is not only administrative negligence — it’s a nationwide danger. AI growth is dependent upon a unified nationwide imaginative and prescient. With out it, Nigeria dangers being left behind within the international AI race, diminished to a shopper marketplace for applied sciences developed elsewhere.
The human price of political ineptitude
At its core, this isn’t only a governance problem; it’s a human one. Every delayed innovation undertaking interprets into misplaced alternatives for thousands and thousands of younger Nigerians who might in any other case be incomes, constructing, and innovating inside a digital ecosystem.
“If an Ekiti State fails to implement an innovation coverage that advantages thousands and thousands of individuals, these thousands and thousands are being blindsided by incompetence,” Fakuade stated bluntly. “The digital financial system can feed Nigeria, no questions requested. However till we’ve got leaders who perceive that, we are going to maintain ravenous ourselves in abundance.”
His feedback reveal the deeper tragedy: Nigeria’s downside will not be an absence of expertise, concepts, and even funding. It’s a failure of political construction, one which rewards loyalty over competence, short-term optics over sustainable coverage, and management over collaboration.
The urgency of reform
If Nigeria is critical about constructing an AI future, it should first repair its political structure. Meaning redefining how management appointments are made, creating efficiency benchmarks for commissioners and ministers, and institutionalising accountability for developmental initiatives.
Fakuade suggests a public efficiency mannequin, one which tracks commissioners’ outputs, holds them to measurable targets, and ensures continuity throughout administrations. “If I’m not doing my job, name me out. But when I’m, empower me. Most commissioners aren’t lazy; they’re simply not supported.”
It’s a radical however obligatory proposition. As a result of within the absence of political accountability, Nigeria’s digital future will stay trapped in the identical cycle of ambition and abandonment that has lengthy outlined its governance.
As Fakuade put it: “The digital financial system can feed Nigeria. However provided that we cease ravenous it with unhealthy politics.”
Elevate your perspective with NextTech Information, the place innovation meets perception.
Uncover the newest breakthroughs, get unique updates, and join with a world community of future-focused thinkers.
Unlock tomorrow’s tendencies as we speak: learn extra, subscribe to our e-newsletter, and turn into a part of the NextTech group at NextTech-news.com
