Germany’s Hydrogen Spine & the Lengthy Shadow of Russian Fuel

Help CleanTechnica’s work via a Substack subscription or on Stripe.

Germany’s newly pressurized hydrogen spine section with no suppliers and no prospects is usually described as a clear break from the previous, a needed early funding in a future hydrogen financial system. The metal tells a unique story. The route, diameter, age, and economics of the pipeline level again to Russian pure gasoline, not ahead to hydrogen demand. This section seems to be much less like a greenfield local weather asset and extra just like the continuation of a gasoline technique whose authentic assumptions collapsed, with hydrogen offering a brand new narrative and an extended amortization horizon.

The bodily details matter. The hydrogen section in query runs roughly 400 km between Lubmin on the Baltic coast and Bobbau in Saxony-Anhalt. It’s a DN1400 pipeline, 1.4 m in diameter, succesful in pure gasoline service of carrying on the order of 55 bcm per yr. On an vitality foundation, that corresponds to roughly 540 TWh per yr, or a median energy stream of about 62 GW. Pipelines of this dimension should not generic. In Germany, there is just one current system that matches this profile and geography: the EUGAL pipeline hall commissioned in 2020 to hold Nord Stream gasoline south via Germany. Based mostly on public details about diameter, route, commissioning dates, and operators, my evaluation is that the hydrogen conversion is drawing on EUGAL metal. This evaluation is predicated completely on publicly out there sources and inference, not on inside data.

EUGAL was not an incremental improve to an ageing community. It was one of many latest and most capital intensive gasoline transmission investments in Europe. The total EUGAL undertaking value round €2.6 billion for roughly 480 km. Scaling that to a 400 km section implies authentic capital expenditure of about €2.2 billion. The pipeline was commissioned in 2020, that means that by 2025 it’s only about 5 years previous. Below German gasoline community regulation, excessive strain metal pipelines are depreciated over lengthy lives, generally between 45 and 65 years. Even utilizing the shorter finish of that vary, greater than 85% of the unique regulated e-book worth stays. Utilizing the longer finish, greater than 90% stays. In easy phrases, roughly €2.0 billion of methane period capital remains to be being recovered via regulated tariffs when the pipeline is repurposed.

The political context through which this metal was laid can’t be separated from the economics. Germany made a deliberate alternative over a number of a long time to anchor industrial competitiveness on giant volumes of pipeline gasoline from Russia. The logic was worth stability, provide safety, and the assumption that financial interdependence would average political threat. This logic survived repeated shocks, together with gasoline disputes with Ukraine, the annexation of Crimea in 2014, and the downing of MH17. By the point EUGAL was authorised and constructed, the dangers had been seen and broadly mentioned, significantly by Poland and the Baltic states. Germany selected to proceed anyway, doubling down on north to south gasoline transmission capability tied to Nord Stream volumes.

Former German Chancellor Gerhard Schröder’s position on this interval is usually handled as a humiliation finest forgotten, however it’s extra helpful to see it as a sign of how normalized Russian vitality alignment had turn into in German political and company circles. Schröder championed Nord Stream as chancellor, then moved instantly into senior roles inside Nord Stream and Rosneft after leaving workplace, persevering with to publicly defend Russian vitality pursuits effectively after Crimea. This was not an remoted anomaly. It mirrored a broader consolation with Russian state vitality corporations as companions, at the same time as geopolitical dangers collected. By the late 2010s, this consolation was embedded in establishments, not simply people.

Company constructions bolstered this alignment. GASCADE, the operator of EUGAL, was for a few years majority owned by Gazprom Germania alongside Wintershall Dea. Gazprom Germania was Russian pure gasoline agency Gazprom’s German holding firm, controlling pipelines, storage, and buying and selling operations. After Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022, Gazprom Germania was seized by the German state and renamed SEFE. Possession modified, however the pipelines didn’t. Their regulatory remedy didn’t reset. Their depreciation schedules didn’t restart. The metal remained within the regulated asset base, incomes allowed returns and depreciation restoration no matter who held the shares.

Understanding how regulated gasoline pipelines generate income is crucial to understanding why repurposing occurred. German transmission system operators earn income based mostly on a regulated asset base, allowed depreciation, and an allowed return on fairness, all topic to a income cap. Pipelines should not service provider property whose revenues rise and fall instantly with throughput. Utilization threat is smoothed via regulatory accounts. If volumes fall, tariffs per unit rise. So long as the asset stays acknowledged, its capital is recovered over time. A pipeline doesn’t should be full to be paid. It wants to stay labeled as needed infrastructure.

Below the unique gasoline case, EUGAL’s economics had been simple. A €2.2 billion asset depreciated over 45 to 65 years implies annual depreciation restoration of roughly €35 million to €50 million. On prime of that, the allowed fairness return applies to the fairness portion of the regulated asset base. Assuming a 40% fairness share and allowed pre tax returns within the vary set by German regulators, the fairness return element would plausibly be on the order of €30 million to €50 million per yr. Earlier than counting working prices, the pipeline might count on capital associated allowed revenues of roughly €70 million to €100 million per yr for many years, as long as it remained in service. This restoration was largely impartial of whether or not gasoline really flowed at design capability.

That enterprise case collapsed in early 2022. Russia invaded Ukraine in February. In September, Nord Stream 1 and a pair of had been sabotaged. The provision rationale for EUGAL disappeared virtually in a single day. A pipeline designed to maneuver 55 bcm per yr of Russian gasoline south via Germany not had a supply. In a market setting, this could set off write downs and loss recognition. In a regulated setting, it triggers a seek for continued relevance.

The hydrogen pivot supplied that relevance. By reclassifying a part of the pipeline as hydrogen infrastructure, the asset stays contained in the regulated perimeter. Conversion prices are added to the asset base relatively than written off. The financial life is prolonged. Public statements emphasize future hydrogen demand and local weather alignment. The important thing level is that none of this requires hydrogen to stream at this time, and even quickly. It requires regulatory approval and a story of future necessity.

The timing of Germany’s hydrogen diplomacy provides an uncomfortable layer. In early 2022, Germany established a hydrogen cooperation workplace in Moscow as a part of its worldwide hydrogen diplomacy framework. This was not an embassy, but it surely was an official authorities presence targeted on hydrogen cooperation. It was arrange months earlier than the invasion, after Crimea, after repeated vitality coercion, and at a time when EUGAL was already in operation. The message was continuity. At the same time as fossil gasoline ties turned politically fragile, Germany was planning submit fossil vitality cooperation with Russia relatively than decoupling.

Technically, the transformed pipeline is introduced as having a hydrogen capability of roughly 20 GW, down from its authentic pure gasoline functionality of about 62 GW. This derating displays hydrogen’s properties, strain limits, and operational constraints. Utilization assumptions are vital. If the hydrogen pipeline operates at 10% utilization, which is optimistic given the truth of inexperienced hydrogen provide and demand, it delivers about 17.5 TWh per yr. The unique gasoline pipeline, even at 70% utilization, would have delivered round 380 TWh per yr. The delivered vitality collapses by an element of greater than 20.

Germany’s hydrogen strategy-era projections assumed complete home demand of roughly 110–130 TWh throughout refining, petrochemicals, ammonia, metal, transport, energy era, and e-fuels, however a practical end-state evaluation collapses that determine to maybe 4–14 TWh. Oil refining demand of 25–30 TWh disappears completely as gasoline refining declines. Transport, e-fuels, and buildings and warmth, collectively projected at 25–40 TWh, are eradicated as direct electrification dominates. Home metal, as soon as assumed to require near 30 TWh, falls to zero as scrap availability, electrical arc furnaces, and imported clear iron items displace hydrogen-based direct discount, with any residual discount extra more likely to depend on biomethane earlier than hydrogen. Energy era shrinks from a projected 10–20 TWh to at most 0–1 TWh as a type of restricted capability insurance coverage relatively than a cloth vitality supply.

What stays is basically petrochemicals, maybe 4–8 TWh for hydrogenation and purification the place hydrogen is chemically unavoidable, and a small residual of home ammonia manufacturing in area of interest instances, probably as much as 5 TWh, with imports protecting most wants. The result’s an order-of-magnitude hole between the hydrogen volumes Germany deliberate its spine round and the volumes its industrial system is more likely to require, underscoring how infrastructure sizing drifted far past reasonable demand.

Prices don’t collapse with radically diminished capability. Taking the remaining methane period e-book worth of roughly €2.0 billion and including an estimated €1.0 billion in hydrogen conversion prices yields a complete regulated capital base close to €3.0 billion. Depreciated over 40 to 60 years, annual depreciation restoration alone is about €50 million to €75 million. Allowed fairness returns add roughly €40 million to €60 million per yr. Capital associated allowed revenues subsequently fall within the vary of €90 million to €135 million per yr. At 17.5 TWh of delivered hydrogen vitality, that interprets to €5 to €8 per MWh of hydrogen only for capital restoration and fairness remuneration.

That determine is just one element. Earlier calculations confirmed that low utilization multiplies community prices per unit of vitality by roughly twentyfold in comparison with the unique gasoline case, pushing pipeline associated prices towards €60 to €70 per MWh of hydrogen on an vitality foundation. When hydrogen is transformed again to electrical energy at 50% to 60% effectivity, the pipeline alone contributes roughly €0.10 to €0.15 per kWh of electrical energy, earlier than electrolysis, storage, compression, or era prices are included. The €1.0 billion conversion provides just a few extra euros per MWh. It doesn’t change the conclusion. The dominant driver is stranded capability unfold over minimal throughput.

Germany has already acknowledged that hydrogen community prices can be prohibitively excessive if early customers had been requested to cowl full prices, and has moved to subsidize them. The federal authorities has put in place a state assist scheme of roughly €3 billion, authorised on the EU degree, to assist the hydrogen core community throughout its ramp-up part. This assist takes the type of state ensures and preferential financing for hydrogen transmission operators, permitting them to borrow at decrease value and run the community with tariffs set under value restoration within the early years. The hole between allowed revenues and picked up community prices is booked into an intertemporal amortisation account and scheduled to be recovered over an extended horizon, explicitly extending to round 2055. In follow, which means that early hydrogen customers are shielded from the true value of an underutilized community, whereas the state absorbs financing threat and commits future community customers and taxpayers to a long time of deferred value restoration.

The distribution of impacts is uneven. Ratepayers and future hydrogen customers bear increased unit prices. Electrical energy shoppers see these prices when hydrogen is framed as a firming or balancing useful resource. The transmission operator continues to get better capital and earn allowed returns. The political system avoids acknowledging {that a} €2.6 billion gasoline funding in-built 2020 was premised on a geopolitical assumption that failed inside two years.

Germany ought to begin from a transparent prognosis that this pipeline section is already a stranded asset in sensible phrases, even when it has been administratively reclassified. Hydrogen provide is unsure, demand is skinny, and the economics depend on subsidies and deferred restoration relatively than use. Lengthy earlier than 2030, it is going to be evident that the anticipated volumes should not materializing at something near the extent wanted to justify continued operation, additional conversion spending, or a long time of amortisation. At that time, the related query won’t be methods to stimulate hydrogen demand to avoid wasting the asset, however methods to restrict the overall value of acknowledging that the unique gasoline funding failed and that the hydrogen pivot didn’t change that actuality.

The bottom-cost response for taxpayers when that recognition happens is a decisive exit relatively than continued smoothing. Germany ought to take away the section from the hydrogen core community designation, halt additional hydrogen-specific capital spending, and formally de-recognize the asset from the regulated base. That step alone prevents further prices from being layered onto an asset that isn’t delivering commensurate public worth. The remaining e-book worth ought to then be addressed via accelerated depreciation and an specific impairment settlement, through which homeowners take in a considerable share of the loss and the state caps its publicity via a one-time decision relatively than a long time of tariff-backed restoration. This strategy concentrates the monetary ache into a brief, clear interval, but it surely minimizes complete taxpayer value by avoiding extended subsidies, financing ensures, and repeated retrofit efforts. Attempting to maintain the pipeline alive via discounted community prices and long-dated amortisation could really feel gentler, however in present-value phrases it’s the costliest choice Germany might select.

Not one of the story of this lifeless on arrival pipeline from nowhere to nowhere requires assuming unhealthy religion or hidden coordination. The result follows from path dependence, regulatory incentives, and a reluctance to acknowledge losses on comparatively new infrastructure. Constructing a excessive capability pipeline for Russian gasoline in 2020 was already a foul financial and local weather thought. Hydrogen didn’t create the issue, and it can’t resolve it. It’s at present getting used to postpone acknowledging that the underlying asset is already stranded, and that the least pricey response will likely be to just accept that actuality and shut the chapter relatively than prolong it.