Canada’s LNG Mirage: Why Most Initiatives Gained’t Be Constructed and Taxpayers Gained’t See the Payoff

Assist CleanTechnica’s work by way of a Substack subscription or on Stripe.

Canada is planning LNG export infrastructure as if world fuel demand progress will persist for many years, however the power system is transferring in a special course. Beneath situations of sustained LNG oversupply, fast world deployment of photo voltaic and batteries, and rising financing prices for fossil infrastructure, most proposed Canadian LNG capability is not going to be constructed. Some of what’s constructed will nonetheless turn into stranded. Public cash already dedicated is not going to generate the financial returns politicians are promising, as a result of the underlying demand assumptions now not maintain.

This evaluation rests on a set of assumptions which can be more and more exhausting to dismiss. World LNG markets are oversupplied as we speak and stay oversupplied by way of the late 2020s primarily based on tasks already below building. By 2026 and 2027, proof of structural LNG demand decline in Asia turns into clear, not due to recession however as a result of electrical energy methods are altering. Photo voltaic technology, paired with batteries, is increasing sooner than forecast in most areas. This mixture displaces fuel straight in energy technology and not directly in business by decreasing wholesale electrical energy costs. By the early 2030s, LNG demand in Asia is now not rising and is as a substitute contracting. On the similar time, financiers are elevating the price of capital for oil and fuel tasks and shifting capital towards renewables and grid infrastructure. Governments proceed to assist LNG with public funds at the same time as personal capital grows extra cautious.

The worldwide LNG provide glut is massive and protracted. Greater than 150 million tons per yr of LNG export capability is already below building worldwide, with anticipated commissioning concentrated between 2025 and 2029. This wave alone exceeds believable demand progress below conservative situations. Further tasks have reached ultimate funding determination however haven’t but damaged floor, including additional optionally available provide. Even when world LNG demand have been to develop at charges seen within the 2010s, which present information now not helps, this capability can be ample to satisfy it. Canada is trying to enter a market that’s already full, with tasks which can be later within the queue and uncovered to service provider threat.

LNG is more and more the power of final resort for importing nations and the most costly strategy to generate electrical energy. It requires fuel manufacturing, processing, lengthy distance pipeline transmission, liquefaction, delivery, regasification, and native distribution. Every step provides value and capital depth. When photo voltaic and wind can be found domestically, and batteries can shift power throughout hours and more and more throughout days, LNG sits on the prime of the fee stack. It’s dispatched when cheaper choices are unavailable. That position can assist reliability, but it surely doesn’t assist excessive utilization or steady long run demand.

Pakistan provides a latest and concrete instance of this dynamic. In 2024, Pakistan put in roughly 17GW of recent photo voltaic capability, a lot of it behind the meter and outdoors central planning processes. This photo voltaic displaced fuel fired technology throughout sunlight hours and diminished general fuel demand. Consequently, Pakistan discovered itself holding commitments for twenty-four LNG cargoes that it now not wanted. The nation was compelled to hunt consumers for these cargoes on the worldwide market, usually at a loss. This was not the results of local weather coverage strain. It was the end result of households and companies putting in the most cost effective out there power choice.

China and India present the identical sample at a lot bigger scale. China continues to put in lots of of GW of photo voltaic and wind per yr, alongside fast growth of battery manufacturing and deployment. Gasoline performs a restricted and shrinking position in China’s energy sector, primarily for peaking and industrial feedstock. LNG import progress has not solely stalled however shrank by double digits in 2025 regardless of good financial progress. India is accelerating photo voltaic deployment, increasing wind, and starting to deploy grid scale batteries. LNG imports fluctuate with worth, and structural progress shouldn’t be solely absent, however declined by double digits in 2025. In each nations, renewables are usually not supplementing fuel. They’re displacing it.

In opposition to this backdrop, Canada has 5 LNG export proposals. LNG Canada Part 1 in Kitimat has a nameplate capability of 14 million tons per yr and is owned by a consortium led by Shell, with Petronas, PetroChina, Mitsubishi, and KOGAS as companions. It’s present process ramp up after being commissioned in 2025, and is predicted to achieve full capability in 2026. LNG Canada Part 2 is a proposed growth of a further 14 million tons per yr. It has not reached ultimate funding determination and stays optionally available.

Cedar LNG is a floating LNG facility proposed close to Kitimat with capability of about 3.3 million tons per yr. It’s a partnership between Pembina Pipeline and the Haisla Nation. It has reached ultimate funding determination and targets commissioning round 2028. Woodfibre LNG close to Squamish has capability of about 2.1 million tons per yr and is owned by Pacific Oil and Gasoline. It has reached ultimate funding determination and is below building, with commissioning focused for 2027 or 2028. Ksi Lisims LNG close to Prince Rupert is a proposed 12 million ton per yr venture led by Western LNG, a Houston-based single venture agency backed by financiers near President Trump, with projected commissioning within the early 2030s, but it surely has not reached ultimate funding determination.

The price of financing determines which LNG tasks transfer ahead and which stall, and it has modified materially from the final decade. Earlier than ultimate funding determination, LNG builders now face fairness return necessities within the 15–20% vary, up from roughly 10–12% that was typical within the early 2010s. Challenge finance debt that after priced at 150–250 foundation factors over benchmark charges with tenors of 15–20 years is now extra prone to require spreads of 300–450 foundation factors with shorter tenors and stricter protection ratios, whether it is out there in any respect. As soon as tasks enter operation, refinancing now not assumes steady long-term utilization. Lenders more and more mannequin declining throughput and decrease terminal worth, which raises efficient operating-phase capital prices into the 9–13% vary for LNG belongings that may beforehand have been handled as quasi-infrastructure. Against this, utility-scale renewables usually clear with fairness returns of 6–9% and long-tenor debt at a lot tighter spreads, reflecting decrease demand threat and extra predictable money flows. Capital shouldn’t be responding to coverage strain or narrative framing. It’s reallocating primarily based on anticipated risk-adjusted returns.

For tasks that haven’t reached ultimate funding determination, greater value of capital is commonly deadly. Ksi Lisims LNG is a big greenfield venture with partial offtake and no working belongings. Beneath situations of oversupply and declining demand, it can’t safe financing at phrases that make financial sense. Its chance of reaching ultimate funding determination falls to single digits. LNG Canada Part 2 is totally different in construction however related in final result. Its sponsors are massive built-in companies that might self finance, however they face alternative value. Doubling capability right into a declining market doesn’t compete nicely towards investments in renewables, grids, or shareholder returns. Part 2 is probably going deferred indefinitely and by no means constructed.

Initiatives which have already reached ultimate funding determination are likely to proceed by way of building as a result of capital is sunk. LNG Canada Part 1 shall be accomplished and function into the 2030s. Cedar LNG and Woodfibre LNG are additionally prone to full building. Completion doesn’t suggest long run success. It means the choice level has handed.

Within the early 2030s, these three services briefly signify about 19.4 million tons per yr of Canadian LNG export capability at full operation, equal to roughly 2.5 Bcf per day of fuel demand. This stage is reached provided that all three run at nameplate capability. That peak, if it happens in any respect is brief lived. As world LNG demand declines and costs stay below strain, utilization falls. By the mid 2030s, LNG Canada Part 1 might function at round 75% utilization, Cedar at about 65%, and Woodfibre at about 50%. Complete efficient exports fall to roughly 13.7 million tons per yr, or about 1.8 Bcf per day.

By 2040, Woodfibre LNG faces a excessive threat of bodily stranding. Its small scale, excessive mounted prices, city location, and publicity to refinancing threat make continued operation troublesome below low utilization. On this situation, Woodfibre is mothballed. LNG Canada Part 1 continues working at round 70% utilization, delivering about 9.8 million tons per yr. Cedar LNG operates opportunistically at round 60% utilization, delivering about 2.0 million tons per yr. Complete Canadian LNG exports fall to about 11.8 million tons per yr, or roughly 1.55 Bcf per day.

To be clear, the world of power globally shall be so radically totally different by 2040 that every one three Canadian LNG crops face a transparent threat of each fiscal and bodily stranding. The situation I’m outlining is conservative, not radical. That is fashionable power actuality with clear developments.

The implications upstream are vital. Western Canadian fuel manufacturing has lengthy been constrained by getting it to markets. LNG was framed as the answer that may unlock a long time of drilling. Beneath this situation, coastal LNG demand peaks briefly after which declines. The bottom Coastal GasLink pipeline capability of about 2.1 Bcf per day stays helpful, however any growth towards 5 Bcf per day turns into unjustifiable and isn’t financed. Devoted infrastructure constructed to serve Woodfibre turns into underutilized or stranded.

Inside Alberta and northeastern British Columbia, the result’s elevated volatility relatively than sustained progress. Core Montney manufacturing stays viable resulting from low prices, however greater value performs face financial stranding. Transmission methods expertise decrease throughput over time, elevating per unit tolls. Greater tolls scale back netbacks, which reduces drilling, which additional lowers throughput. This suggestions loop results in fiscal stranding of belongings which can be nonetheless bodily current.

Public cash is deeply embedded on this system. The federal authorities has offered about $275 million in direct assist for LNG Canada Part 1. Cedar LNG has acquired about $200 million in federal funding and $200 million from British Columbia, alongside lots of of thousands and thousands in loans from Export Improvement Canada. Coastal GasLink has benefited from Crown financing. Woodfibre’s supporting pipeline infrastructure is being constructed by a regulated utility, with prices recovered from ratepayers over a long time.

These commitments don’t disappear when utilization falls. Grants are spent no matter outcomes. Loans carry credit score threat that turns into political if tasks underperform. Regulated utility belongings are paid for by way of charges even when throughput declines. That is how long run taxpayer and ratepayer burdens emerge, not by way of outright nationalization, however by way of socialized prices and shortened asset lives.

Western Canada already has a fossil gas pipeline, the Trans Mountain Enlargement (TMX), that we’re paying $2.5 to $3 billion a yr in efficient oil subsidies for as a result of the prices ballooned and oil firms are paying pre-contracted, low charges per barrel. That ought to weigh closely in discussions in political circles about exposing Canadian ratepayers to extra structural, lengthy lasting cash for the oil and fuel business.

Politicians usually justify these investments on the idea of jobs, revenues, and power safety. Beneath the assumptions laid out right here, these advantages are far smaller than marketed. Fewer tasks are constructed. People who function achieve this at decrease utilization. Asset lives shorten. Royalty and tax flows are weaker. In the meantime, public capital might have been deployed into power methods which can be rising relatively than shrinking.

The federal Main Initiatives Workplace, established below Mark Carney’s steering to speed up tasks deemed strategically necessary, highlights a rising disconnect between political prioritization and market actuality. LNG Canada Part 2 and Ksi Lisims LNG have each been positioned on the Main Initiatives Workplace listing, signaling federal intent to fast-track approvals and coordinate allowing. Cedar LNG has additionally acquired sturdy federal consideration and direct funding, even when it sits in a special class as a smaller Indigenous-partnered venture. Woodfibre LNG, in contrast, shouldn’t be a part of the Main Initiatives Workplace framework and has proceeded largely by way of provincial and regulatory channels.

The mismatch is hanging. The tasks most prominently elevated by the Main Initiatives Workplace are exactly these least prone to attain ultimate funding determination or function at significant utilization below situations of LNG oversupply, declining Asian demand, and rising value of capital. In the meantime, the tasks most certainly to function into the 2030s are both already sanctioned or too small to function centrally in federal industrial technique. The Main Initiatives Workplace is optimizing for velocity and symbolism, however markets are optimizing for threat and return, and people two filters are more and more deciding on totally different outcomes.

Canada shouldn’t be alone in going through this mismatch between fossil infrastructure planning and power system actuality. The distinction is that Canada is committing public cash late within the cycle. LNG export terminals and pipelines are lengthy lived belongings. Photo voltaic, wind, and batteries are being deployed sooner than these belongings pays again. Planning primarily based on previous demand developments results in stranded capability and stranded public funding.

The upside of all of this, minor although the silver lining shall be, is that far much less Canadian LNG shall be shipped every year than present heady desires counsel, lowering considerably the local weather injury that our merchandise trigger globally. It’s nonetheless billions of tons of CO2e over the lifespan of those tasks from our product with federal backing, in an period when the Worldwide Courtroom of Justice has made it clear that the legal responsibility buck stops with the federal government, not the companies.

The conclusion shouldn’t be that fuel disappears in a single day. It’s that LNG turns into a declining, capital constrained enterprise a lot earlier than venture timelines assume. Most proposed capability is rarely constructed. Some constructed capability turns into stranded. Public cash doesn’t earn the returns promised. The hole between political expectations and financial outcomes widens, not due to ideology, however as a result of the power system modified course whereas infrastructure planning didn’t.