The U.S. Supreme Court docket has struck down certainly one of President Donald Trump’s most aggressive commerce instruments. But inside hours, a brand new tariff path emerged. For Korean startups constructing export-driven progress methods, the authorized reset in Washington doesn’t take away threat. It reshapes it. The query now isn’t whether or not tariffs exist, however how steady the principles behind them actually are.
Supreme Court docket Strikes Down IEEPA Tariffs
On February 20, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court docket dominated 6–3 that tariffs imposed underneath the Worldwide Emergency Financial Powers Act have been illegal. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote that IEEPA doesn’t authorize the president to impose tariffs, noting that Congress holds constitutional authority over taxation.
The ruling invalidated country-specific “reciprocal” tariffs and different levies tied to nationwide emergency declarations, together with measures utilized to main buying and selling companions.
In response, President Trump introduced he would signal an government order underneath Part 122 of the Commerce Act of 1974 to impose a 10 % international tariff. He mentioned the measure would doubtless take impact inside three days.
Part 122 permits momentary tariffs of as much as 15 % for a most of 150 days to handle balance-of-payments considerations. It’s extra restricted than IEEPA in period and scope.
Trump additionally referenced potential use of Part 232 of the Commerce Growth Act and Part 301 of the Commerce Act as various authorities.
Why the Authorized Foundation of U.S. Tariffs Now Issues
The Court docket’s resolution didn’t reject tariffs typically. It rejected the use of IEEPA because the authorized basis.
Roberts wrote that the president should establish clear congressional authorization to impose tariffs of broad scope and period. The ruling leaves intact different statutory pathways, although these routes carry procedural constraints and cut-off dates.
Studies additionally verify that tariffs imposed underneath IEEPA represented roughly half of present month-to-month tariff collections. U.S. Customs information cited in courtroom filings present greater than USD 130 billion had been collected underneath the challenged measures.
The choice didn’t make clear how refunds could be dealt with. Justice Brett Kavanaugh, in dissent, acknowledged that returning collected funds might change into sophisticated. President Trump indicated the matter could also be litigated for years.
This introduces a brand new variable into international commerce: authorized sturdiness.
Trump Strikes to Part 122 and Part 301
President Trump described the ruling as “very disappointing” and mentioned stronger authorities stay out there. He acknowledged that international locations celebrating the choice “is not going to be dancing for lengthy.”
U.S. Commerce Consultant Jamieson Greer mentioned Part 301 investigations relaxation on stable authorized footing. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent indicated various tariff authorities might protect total tariff income ranges.
The administration emphasised that solely the IEEPA pathway was invalidated, not presidential tariff authority extra broadly.
What the U.S. Tariff Shift Means for Korean Export Startups
South Korea stays deeply uncovered to U.S. market entry throughout {hardware}, superior manufacturing, mobility methods, semiconductors, and defense-related provide chains.
The fast tariff charge could shift. But the deeper problem is coverage volatility.
Korean startups constructing U.S.-facing income fashions now face three structural pressures:
- First, momentary tariffs underneath Part 122 are restricted to 150 days except prolonged. That introduces timing threat in pricing, contract negotiation, and provide commitments.
- Second, potential Part 301 investigations create sector-specific publicity. The statute targets what the U.S. defines as unfair or discriminatory commerce practices. This could have an effect on chosen industries with out broad announcement cycles.
- Third, refund uncertainty complicates importer relationships. U.S. patrons could delay procurement selections till authorized readability improves.
For software-first startups with minimal bodily export publicity, the impression is muted. But, for robotics, AI {hardware}, EV elements, industrial automation, and supplies startups, the chance profile adjustments.
This isn’t theoretical. Tariffs underneath IEEPA beforehand reached as much as 50 % for some buying and selling companions. Part 122 caps authority at 15 % and 150 days, however the authorized pivot alerts ongoing experimentation inside U.S. commerce coverage.
Cross-border enterprise capital additionally adjusts underneath uncertainty. Traders consider commerce friction when underwriting export-heavy startups. That influences valuation, capital allocation, and U.S. enlargement technique.
World Enterprise Capital Faces Renewed Commerce Uncertainty
The Supreme Court docket ruling reinforces constitutional limits on government tariff authority. It additionally confirms that commerce coverage can swing shortly inside statutory boundaries.
World founders now face a brand new layer of market entry threat formed by judicial interpretation. In Seoul, policymakers are reminded that export diversification is not optionally available. Enterprise funds should reassess portfolio publicity to regulatory swings tied to U.S. commerce legislation.
The authorized foundation of tariffs has moved past technical debate. It now shapes strategic planning.
What Comes Subsequent for U.S. Tariff Coverage
President Trump has signaled {that a} 10 % international tariff underneath Part 122 will transfer forward, with further investigations underneath Sections 232 and 301 more likely to comply with. The Supreme Court docket didn’t deal with tariff refunds, leaving room for extended litigation.
The bigger sign is structural. The authorized instrument has modified, however the commerce posture stays. For Korean startups reliant on U.S.-bound {hardware} exports, tariff threat ought to now be handled as a recurring working situation, not a one-off disruption. What issues subsequent is structural flexibility, not short-term response.
Key Takeaway on U.S. IEEPA Tariff Influence on Korean Export Startups
- The U.S. Supreme Court docket dominated that IEEPA doesn’t authorize presidential tariffs.
- Greater than $130 billion in IEEPA tariff income could face authorized disputes.
- Trump introduced a 10 % international tariff underneath Part 122 of the Commerce Act of 1974.
- Part 122 limits tariffs to fifteen % and 150 days with out congressional extension.
- Different authorities equivalent to Sections 232 and 301 stay out there.
- Korean export-driven startups face renewed contract, pricing, and procurement threat within the U.S. market.
- Commerce coverage volatility now consists of judicial threat alongside government decision-making.
– Keep Forward in Korea’s Startup Scene –
Get real-time insights, funding updates, and coverage shifts shaping Korea’s innovation ecosystem.
➡️ Comply with KoreaTechDesk on LinkedIn, X (Twitter), Threads, Bluesky, Telegram, Fb, and WhatsApp Channel.
Elevate your perspective with NextTech Information, the place innovation meets perception.
Uncover the most recent breakthroughs, get unique updates, and join with a worldwide community of future-focused thinkers.
Unlock tomorrow’s traits immediately: learn extra, subscribe to our e-newsletter, and change into a part of the NextTech group at NextTech-news.com
