Musk Pay Package deal Proposal Promotes Highly effective Push Again

Assist CleanTechnica’s work via a Substack subscription or on Stripe.

Numerous information comes into the CleanTechnica communications middle within the third sub-basement of our world headquarters, the place the teletype machines clatter night time and day to maintain up with the most recent developments on the earth of fresh vitality, electrical autos, and the rest that entails the search to maintain people from turning the Earth right into a cauldron of demise for our species.

Just a few days in the past, Zachary Shahan shared an e-mail with me that introduced knowledgeable funding advisory group was recommending that Tesla shareholders reject the most recent proposal by the Tesla board that might reward Elon Musk with emollients valued at practically one trillion {dollars} if he achieved sure milestones within the years to return.

On the time, I instructed Zachary I wasn’t all that excited by doing the story, as institutional buyers prior to now had suggested towards munificent pay packages for the customarily erratic Elon and had been soundly overruled by shareholders. There appeared little motive to imagine they might not accomplish that once more.

However there was one twist within the story for the reason that e-mail was acquired. Within the wee hours of the morning on Sunday, October 19, 2025, Musk posted on his private delinquent media platform, “Tesla is value greater than all different automotive firms mixed. Which of these CEOs would you prefer to run Tesla? It received’t be me.”

It doesn’t take a mind surgeon to determine that Musk has simply put everybody on discover that except he will get his approach, he’s going to take his ball and go dwelling. I go away it as much as readers to resolve if this can be a smart enterprise transfer or a mood tantrum by a petulant man-child. Clearly, Musk ought to have a kind of bumper stickers on the again of his private vehicle that claims, “Does Not Play Effectively With Others.”

ISS Opposes Musk Pay Plan

All of it started on October 17, when CNBC reported that Institutional Shareholder Providers was recommending that Tesla buyers vote towards the Giga Pay Package deal for Musk, saying it “has an astronomical grant worth conditioned upon far-reaching efficiency targets that, if achieved, would create huge worth for shareholders.” It stated that whereas some shareholders could assist the pay plan, “there are unmitigated considerations surrounding the particular award’s magnitude and design.”

In an delinquent media publish, Tesla accused ISS of lacking “basic factors of investing and governance,” and complained that the advisors had beforehand “really useful towards compensation that shareholders have voted on twice earlier than (and that Elon has already earned), in addition to the 2025 CEO Efficiency Award.”

After the ISS announcement, a second skilled investor advisory service additionally urged shareholders to reject the deal. In line with Enterprise Insider, Glass Lewis & Co. instructed shoppers the award “warrants vital shareholder concern.” That was greater than a press launch. The Glass Lewis assertion was 90 pages lengthy and referred to as the proposed pay package deal “excessively dilutive.” It estimated that, if absolutely exercised, it might reduce current shareholders’ possession by about 11.3 %.

Glass Lewis valued the deal at $141.6 billion — way over Tesla’s personal $87.8 billion estimate — and stated Musk might reap “billions in compensation and a materially elevated possession stake” even when he hits simply one of many 12 efficiency tranches. “The potential upfront and future dilutive impacts to shareholders, in addition to extraordinary pay ranges with out commensurately distinctive efficiency via the achievement of even only a few tranches, warrant vital concern,” Glass Lewis wrote.

The report additionally raised crimson flags about Tesla’s board independence and oversight of Musk’s pay, saying Musk’s compensation is being reviewed by a board that has lengthy confronted questions on its closeness to the CEO, citing administrators with private or skilled ties to him that date again years. The agency stated that dynamic was central to a Delaware courtroom ruling earlier this yr that struck down Musk’s 2018 pay package deal, discovering that these relationships compromised the approval course of. These considerations stay related, Glass Lewis added.

It questioned whether or not the proposed pay package deal went far sufficient to make sure Musk’s focus stays on Tesla, given his slate of different ventures, together with SpaceX, xAI, X, and Neuralink. “The dimensions of the award might consequence within the state of affairs the place Mr. E. Musk receives billions in compensation and a materially elevated possession stake,” the agency stated, “even when solely a single tranche is earned.”

Glass Lewis warned the early milestones “don’t seem as Herculean as the dimensions of the proposed tranches would recommend,” implying Musk might unlock large worth with out delivering the sort of outlier efficiency the package deal purports to demand.

Tesla Calls Warnings “Misguided”

Tesla pushed again vigorously on Musk’s private delinquent media channel on October 20, saying each ISS and Glass Lewis had been “misguided,” and noting they’ve “really useful towards Tesla’s proposals time and time once more for the reason that 2018 CEO Efficiency Award was launched. It’s a superb factor our shareholders ignored these suggestions, in any other case they might have missed out on our market capitalization hovering by 20x from March 2018 to August 2025.”

The corporate accused the advisors of utilizing “one-size-fits-all checklists” that “undermine shareholders’ pursuits,” and added their suggestions “try to override the mandate our shareholders delivered to Elon and ignore the staggering monetary outcomes delivered underneath Elon’s management.”

Over the weekend, Cathie Wooden, whose ARK Investments was an early investor in Tesla, defended Musk and the Tesla board, saying ISS and Glass Lewis had been those with the issue. In line with Fortune, on Sunday, Wooden additionally took to delinquent media to say it was “unhappy if not damning” that proxy advisory agency have a lot affect. She was particularly crucial of the connection between proxy corporations and index funds, claiming they’ve an outsized affect over voting due to the big variety of shares they management for his or her buyers.

“Index funds do no basic analysis, but dominate institutional voting. Index-based investing is a type of socialism. Our funding system is damaged,” she thundered. Fortune pushed again on her assertions, saying that their father or mother firms completely do their due diligence.

“The three largest index funds on the earth are managed by Vanguard, State Road, and BlackRock, and all three do intensive analysis for proxy voting selections and have their very own proxy voting tips that they publish. Additionally, these three funds maintain over $2 trillion monitoring the S&P 500 index and characterize the overwhelming majority of retail merchants invested within the inventory market. Whereas index funds don’t do analysis to choose shares, they make the most of their analysis base for voting selections.”

In one other collection of posts, Wooden claimed ISS and Glass Lewis don’t see the potential in Tesla that ARK Make investments does and seemingly recommended index funds must be stripped of their voting energy. “I imagine that historical past will resolve that Glass Lewis and ISS have been menaces to innovation, enabling passive buyers who care about ‘monitoring errors’ to their indexes however don’t care about a lot else,” Wooden wrote.

Russell Rhoads, an affiliate professor of monetary administration at Indiana College, instructed Fortune that whereas buyers in an lively fund know its administration could push for adjustments to an organization whether it is struggling, the identical isn’t true for passive buyers who put their cash into index funds. “Normally, if I put cash right into a fund, that’s imagined to mirror the index, that could be a passive funding,” he stated. “I’m simply investing out there and never making an attempt to affect something, what some other firms are doing enterprise smart.”

Energy & Management

InsideEVs contributor Rob Stumpf put issues fairly succinctly when he stated, “Translated from Muskspeak, it roughly signifies that he doesn’t wish to be instructed what to do, or what to say, and needs to have sufficient voting energy to make sure that stays unchallenged. In the meantime, buyers are in a lose-lose state of affairs. Both approve Musk’s trillion-dollar golden leash or danger his efforts being utilized elsewhere. And when a lot of Tesla’s valuation is perceived to be tied to the CEO, the latter may very well be catastrophic to the corporate’s worth.”

The Tesla annual assembly is scheduled to happen on November 5, 2025. If previous historical past is any information, the pay package deal for Musk will likely be endorsed enthusiastically by the vast majority of Tesla shareholders and Musk will likely be ebullient, proclaiming wondrous issues forward for the corporate.

We at CleanTechnica have grown weary of Musk’s antics, charades, political stunts, and spittle infused tantrums. This colossal pay package deal appears outrageous to us, coming from a captive board which can be actually little greater than co-conspirators in Musk’s ongoing Ponzi scheme. Maybe we’re simply jealous as a result of nobody is providing us a trillion {dollars} to battle for reality, justice, and the EV revolution.

Put it all the way down to bitter grapes, if you’ll, however we expect this pay package deal is wrong-headed and akin to pouring gasoline on the bonfire that’s Musk’s ego. Whereas having private robots in our properties making the mattress and doing the laundry is all very interesting, we query whether or not promoting 27 variations of the Mannequin Y is actually the work of a genius or just the results of placing somebody who is aware of subsequent to nothing concerning the automobile enterprise in control of an vehicle manufacturing firm.

Seize your popcorn on November 5. The Tesla annual assembly guarantees to be fairly a present.