RCPS Funding Practices in Korea Put Startups at Threat, Driving Momentum for Change – KoreaTechDesk

In Korea’s startup ecosystem, one funding instrument dominates early-stage funding: Redeemable Convertible Most well-liked Shares (RCPS). Whereas designed to guard buyers, RCPS funding contracts typically carry high-interest reimbursement clauses that may weigh closely on startup founders if progress stalls. Latest disputes and rehabilitation instances are drawing consideration to how these practices have an effect on entrepreneurial resilience and why requires reform are gaining momentum.

Understanding RCPS Funding and Their Prevalence in Korean Startup Funding

In Korea’s startup funding panorama, Redeemable Convertible Most well-liked Shares (RCPS) stay a dominant funding instrument, significantly for firms transferring past seed capital into Sequence A phases.

RCPS constructions give buyers the appropriate to demand reimbursement of their principal, typically with added curiosity, if milestones equivalent to follow-on funding or an IPO should not achieved throughout the agreed interval.

Business specialists estimate that 70–80% of early-stage offers in Korea contain RCPS, making it the usual relatively than the exception. Whereas RCPS affords buyers safety, it typically leaves founders weak if progress targets are missed.

For startups going through slower-than-expected market traction or capital shortages, reimbursement clauses can create unsustainable debt burdens that hinder a second try at progress.

How RCPS Funding Impacts Startups: The Value of Excessive-Curiosity Contracts

Contracts reviewed by incubators and college startup facilities reveal clauses demanding reimbursement with rates of interest exceeding 7% yearly, usually inside three years of funding. For founders, this converts what’s introduced as fairness funding right into a construction resembling high-interest debt.

As a result of these reimbursement phrases are legally embedded in contracts, disputes virtually all the time favor buyers when taken to court docket. The result’s a rising variety of founders who discover themselves unable to restart after failure, weighed down by reimbursement obligations relatively than positioned for reinvention.

Case Examine: Urbanbase and Shinhan Capital

A current dispute between Urbanbase, a Korean 3D spatial knowledge startup, and Shinhan Capital illustrates the dangers.

Going through enterprise difficulties, Urbanbase entered court docket receivership in December 2023. Shinhan Capital, concluding that it couldn’t get well funds via a share sale, filed swimsuit in opposition to the founder to implement reimbursement below RCPS phrases.

Within the first-instance ruling, the court docket sided with Shinhan Capital, leaving the Urbanbase founder liable for roughly ₩1.2 billion (about US$900,000) in repayments.

Urbanbase CEO Ha Jin-woo said that Shinhan Capital had initially thought-about withdrawing the lawsuit throughout final yr’s public debate over aggressive debt assortment practices. Nevertheless, as public consideration pale, the agency introduced its intent to implement inventory repurchase rights throughout its whole portfolio.

CEO Ha Jin-woo recalled,

“Final yr, when extreme debt assortment practices sparked public controversy, Shinhan Capital privately instructed it’d withdraw its lawsuit, admitting its actions had been improper. However as public consideration pale this yr, the agency reversed course and introduced it will implement inventory repurchase rights throughout all its portfolio firms, together with Urbanbase.”

The case has drawn consideration to the imbalance of energy between buyers and startups below RCPS frameworks.

Challenges in Startup Rehabilitation

The RCPS subject overlaps with broader difficulties in Korea’s company rehabilitation course of. As soon as-prominent startups equivalent to TMON, Wemakeprice, Jeong Yook Gak, Balan, and Watcha have all entered restructuring because of monetary pressure and failed fundraising. But, even with court-approved rehabilitation, many discover restoration almost unimaginable.

Yoon Byung-woon, head of the Korea Company Rehabilitation Affiliation, advised Seoul Financial Every day,

“Until a court docket’s rehabilitation approval is instantly adopted by a credit standing improve, true restoration is almost unimaginable. Even after approval, monetary establishments proceed to assign distressed companies a low credit standing (D), making loans inaccessible. Startups that need to safe provide contracts and want efficiency bonds are sometimes denied issuance because of their low credit score standing.”

This cycle leaves rehabilitated startups unable to rebuild, even after surviving the authorized course of.

Towards a More healthy Funding Panorama

Whereas RCPS protects buyers, the construction highlights the strain between capital safety and entrepreneurial resilience. Business voices recommend that transferring towards frequent inventory funding practices may higher stability pursuits, permitting founders area to get well and innovate whereas nonetheless giving buyers fairness upside.

As extra Korean startups enter restructuring, the talk over RCPS is changing into more and more pressing. The query stays whether or not the ecosystem can evolve towards funding practices that stability danger extra pretty between entrepreneurs and buyers.

Keep knowledgeable on Korea’s fast-moving startup and tech scene—comply with KoreaTechDesk on social media: LinkedIn, X (Twitter), Bluesky, and Fb for insights, funding information, and trade updates.