Supreme Court docket agrees to listen to lawsuit over Air Canada junk charges

The Supreme Court docket of Canada has agreed to listen to arguments associated to a class-action lawsuit towards Air Canada that alleges the airline is overcharging clients on ticket costs.

Within the go well with, client advocacy group Unions des Consommateurs and Montreal resident Michael Silas argue that Air Canada doesn’t embody the entire further charges it expenses in its listed on-line costs. Silas claims that he needed to pay $124 greater than the fare worth when factoring in further expenses (also called “junk charges“) that weren’t proven throughout step one of Air Canada’s on-line checkout course of.

The incident occurred in 2010 and was the topic of a case within the Quebec Court docket of Enchantment. Final 12 months, the Quebec courtroom dominated that Air Canada should pay passengers greater than $10 million resulting from these junk charges. Justice Judith Harvie argued that the airline confirmed “ignorance and laxity” when it concluded that it was exempt from the provincial Shopper Safety Act provision resulting from air transport usually falling underneath federal jurisdiction. This resolution overturned a decrease courtroom resolution that discovered Air Canada in violation of the legislation however not responsible of inflicting any hurt, which might have allowed it to keep away from any punitive damages.

A listening to date has not but been set for the Supreme Court docket case.

Picture credit score: Air Canada

Supply: Unions des Consommateurs Through: The Canadian Press